MBTI, Myers-Briggs, and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Trust in the United States and other countries.
there is structure behind all of this.
| From: | G. Albers |
| galbers@bigfoot.com |
| Date: | Thur, 14 Jun 2001 |
I am consistantly an ENFP and a Gemini. My enneagrams are much less
consistant. However, types 2, 4 and 7 are always there with an occasional 9
creeping in. None of my ennegrams results ever include a 6 or a 5. So I'm not
sure of the validity of the relationships above.
+++You may not completely want, at this time, to know your type. This would particularly apply if you are in your early twenties or are younger.
| From: | campbell hardy |
| campbellsoup01@hotmail.com |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jun 2001 |
I am an ESTJ from the age of 20 up till now (23ya). When I was 16 I
scored ENTJ. As for the other dimensions they have been very stable across time.
Some people argue that MBTI has a poor retest reliability. Whatever! 13 other
social psych grad students and I have remained very stable. The pursuit of
correlating the p types and pd's is a worthwhile venture. I have read your page
up and down, shown many friends your page, and will continue to search in the
same dircetions as you have! Please contact me with any additional info,
questions, stumps, or ideas. I will be very interested to hear from you.
+++Thanks Campbell. I appreciate your interest.
| From: | Jack |
| mediator268@cs.com |
| Date: | Thur, 24 May 2001 |
Sometime this past winter, I recalled that you subscribe to the Socionics
theory. After reading "C. G. Jung: The Collected Works" Sixth Volume, I tend
to agree with Socionic followers that the MBTI was wrong in their assertion of
type functions for introverts. It is clear that Jung termed Judgers as the
feeling and thinking function, and Perceivers as the intuitive and sensor
functions, subsequently changing the dominant function of, for an example INTJ
type, from Ni to Ti, and the seceeding functions would also change. However, in
review of Socionics type profile by functions, they have the INTJ as Ti, Ne, Fi,
Se. Since the T is dominant, it seems that the weak function would be the
opposite, or F. Also, Socionics shows both judging functions and perceiving
functions to be the same for each type, i.e. both extraverted or both
introverted. It would also seem that they would change making, once again the
INTJ example, Ti, Ne, Si, Fe. Is there an explanation in keeping t!
he judging and perceiving functions the same?
Jack
+++Hi Jack. I don't know anything about Socionics, or the Jungian and Myers-Briggs® function theories. I am an adopter of Keirsey's simplified scheme of types.
| From: | Gary |
| greecetrap@aol.com |
| Date: | Wed, 23 May 2001 |
Now that I've gone and taken the short version of the Enneagram, I
find it interesting that not only am I an Aries, and an INTJ, but I also scored
as 5w4.
| From: | Gary T |
| greecetrap@aol.com |
| Date: | Wed, 23 May 2001 |
Sometimes I feel as if I've been all over the place with Keirsey's Myers-Briggs
type sorter. The first time I took the test in PLEASE UNDERSTAND ME, I scored as
INXP, so I've been trying to figure out if I am actually borderline, or if I'm
one or the other.
More recently, I've been taking an online course that is intended to help with
career choice, using Myers-Briggs typology.
I'm definitely Introverted and Intuitive, but the T/F and J/P sometimes leave me
reeling, and confused. The course I'm taking utilizes a book in which dominant
and auxiliary functions are discussed. When I read through those, I found that I
must be a dominant intuitive. Nothing else seemed to fit. This seemed to point
to INTJ...not at all what I expected.
With regard to this web page, however, it is very, very interesting that INTJ's
are said to be Aries, given that I'm an Aries on the cusp of Pisces.
Hmmm, yet another interesting system to consider and take into account....
Say what you want, Say, but if you were a *real* INTP you would be a Gemini! As
for those so-called ESFJ Geminis... it's obvious to me that their birth
certificates were forged. Say of course prefers the horniness of Aries but
being a closet ENTP, she's a closet Gemini as well. *chairshot*
INTP Revolution - It's time.
We're Out There.
| From: | Lisza....INTx, 4w5, Sensitive-Idiosyncratic |
| Date: | Wed, 9 May 2001 |
In response to the suggestion that ESFJs probably aren't Geminis: two of my
closest family members are ESFJ Geminis. My ex-"bestfriend" was an ISFJ but very
strong on FJ and S, and only moderate on introversion, so almost an ESFJ. The
most characteristically "feminine" women I've known in my life are more often
Geminis than other signs or more often born around May-June than any other time
of year. The point is that xSFJ out of all the types most fit the stereotypical
feminine personality.
I know it's probably all just a coincidence about the people I know, because I
agree with Mr.Kelly that astrology signs don't actually correlate with
psychological types in reality. BTW, Mr.Kelly, I like the way you include
astrological signs as one of the typologies in your chart. Although people
generally don't take astrology seriously, the 12 signs really are 12 personality
types and astrology is probably the most wellknown of all personality
typologies.
+++Thanks for your good points on xSFJ and the astrological types. I kind of follow the postings at www.9types.com, Lisza (though it's hard to tell who's who, sometimes). Your thoughts are interesting.
| From: | Say |
| sarah@mcfarland.co.uk |
| Date: | Wed, 9 May 2001 |
Gracie, you lie. We INTPs are Aries people, and you only disagree because you
are jealous of our horns, and our association with an interesting planet.
Actually talking about this site, I am most definately an Enneagram 5, although
I don't agree with that schizoid reference . . . actually, of all the
personality disorders I've identified with, schizoid was never on the list.
Then again, I wouldn't be an INTP if I did what the majority did.
| From: | Gracie Groove |
| dooloop@hotmail.com |
| Date: | Wed, 9 May 2001 |
uncanny! I've been telling my fellow INTPs that there was a correspondence
between type and astrological sign, and even though the majority of us [who
actually answered my dumb little poll]were Geminis nobody wanted to buy it. No
better way to sort of prove one's unfounded suppositions than to display a
geocities website in their faces! Obviously everybody who's not Gemini is uh...
I dunno, ESFJs or something.
hee.
-Gracie G.
+++Thanks Gracie. The only people that I pay any attention to are INTPs.
| From: | Kevin |
| kevin@metroeast.net |
| Date: | Thur, 3 May 2001 |
I'm a 31 year old male. I'm agressive yet definitely ENFP, Enneagram type 8,
strong tendancies toward compensatory narcissim, and I'm a Gemini. Those don't
quite match up with your chart.
I own and run my own technology corporation(s) and am very independent. I
communicate extremely well and am also a talented musician.
My biggest fears are rejection and betrayal...especially in intimate
relationships. As a result, I often require irrational levels of validation and
reassurance. When I feel betrayed, I tend to obsess about it and must restrain
myself from the compulsion to be confrontational.
I am capable of being charming or threatening to the extreme. I protect and
extend trust those who are loyal to me. I perpetually plot (obsess about)
revenge on those who betray me. Although never physically violent (due to
self-restraint), I do not hesitate to be mentally brutal to my offenders.
I don't know if these things provide you with any further insight, but I
honestly believe that your table is still under construction. :-)
--K
+++Thanks Kevin - great post. Your typing of yourself together with your other insights make sense to me if I see your type as Vigilant. I'll probably have more to say after I've thought about it a while.
+++The fact that you're a Gemini doesn't mean anything here. What I have done with my matches is comparable to your picking the astrological sign which you think is closest to your type, not just going by what your sun sign happens to be.
I don't have a problem with you identifying yourself by types which don't exactly correspond to my model. After all, you're picking what you want. My Correspondence is not at all scientific; it's imaginative, correlative, and prescriptive. Since my objective was to match the types of these various systems on a one-to-one basis, I ended up not with an empirical finding but an "ideal" correlation. I've imaginatively and arbitrarily decided which categories most closely match, and I prescribe how people *should* identify themselves typologically in the various systems. The whole thing (as is each of these typologies) is very comparable to astrology. The test of its value is not one of scientific truth or falsity but of usefulness in soul-making.
| From: | anil neerukonda |
| akcld@usa.net |
| Date: | Tue, 1 May 2001 |
I am a 27y old male from India. I was a schizoid guy in the past. I have read a
lot of literature on this topic of late. I am getting over this personality
and becoming normal after 3 years of medication on the drug sulbutiamine made by
Servier Laboratories, France. I have an asthenic constitution and this is
responsible for lack of emotion and motivation. Severe loss of perception
,thinking and loss of object relationships has made me remain aloof from people
all my life . I believe to have become asthenic due to intestinal candidiasis
right from childhood. The drug that i am taking is bringing my autonomic nervous
system to normality and this is the key to my recovery. Candida causes adrenal
dysfunction and this is the reason for lack of sex hormones in the
asthenic/schizoid.
| From: | Ginn |
| CsWeapon@hotmail.com |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Apr 2001 |
goto www.britannica.com
+++ http://search.britannica.com/search?query=personality+types
| From: | Morticia |
| morticia_n_addams@yahoo.com |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Apr 2001 |
I find it interesting that the axis of types revolves around S/N and
T/F as I fluctuate in how I test from year to year around I/E and T/F with N and
P being constant. It seems to be based on whether I am in a learning/networking
mode (testing as E and T) a teaching/intimate relationships-focused mode (I and
F) or a learning/intimate relationships-focused mode (E and F). I suppose if I
were in a teaching/networking mode I would test as I and T. Perhaps the model
could be made more flexible as to accomodate this kind of alternate fluxuation?
+++Thanks again, Morticia. A very insightful observation. But the MBTI® *does* accommodate this fluctuation if it's looked at as a four-factor dimensional system, which it really is, rather than as a system of types, which it really isn't.
| From: | Morticia |
| morticia_n_addams@yahoo.com |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Apr 2001 |
the Tarot also has a system of suits which would also be related to the four
temperments:
Cups would be Idealist (this also translates to Hearts)
Swords would be Rationalist (this also translates to Spades)
Pentacles would be Guardian (this also translates to Diamonds)
Wands would be Hedonist (this also translates to Clubs)
Thanks Morticia. That's interesting.
| From: | Jason |
| wudong@free2air.com.au |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Apr 2001 |
G'day, I'm very interested in personality studies, and I just recently came
across the Keirsey test, but I've found I've had some conflicting results with
the Keirsey temperament sorter.. I have strong morals and ideals(Idealist), I am
obedient and like hierachies(Guardian), I love deep thinking and
learning(Rational), and I am very creative and dramatic(Artisan)
I'm quite confused as to which personality I really am!
I have also noticed similarties between the Enneagram, Keirsey Sorter and a
person's birth order - as though birth order determines your temperament.
Because of my observations, I therefore have found your page very interesting.
Perhaps Mr Keirsey is one of the Idealist temperaments, which is why he explains
all the personalities i
| From: | betty |
| bettyannw@aol.com |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Apr 2001 |
I am a 2, and ENFP.... (although INFP part of the time too)
4 for INFP makes sense but 6 for ENFP doesn't for me....
Thank you for allowing input.
Betty
+++Thanks Betty.
| From: | Anastasia |
| abanniko@lhup.edu |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Mar 2001 |
I've just come across with the enneagram technique while writing an article
about the school play.
Basically the whole scheme matched me but I wasn't taking tests and just fitted
everything approximately. I'm still not sure if I'm more of Inventory or
Solitary: they have different characteristics that contradict with each other.
But since I'm Gemini, I can have both, right??? For instance, sometimes I feel
like being alone and sometimes I can't wait to show off!
This site also helped me with my article, so thank you very much!
+++Thanks Anastasia. You're welcome.
| From: | Stephen Wayne Nichols |
| snichols@your-net |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Mar 2001 |
Your chart fits me pretty well accept
for the astrological sign (I am a Taurus). I have taken all the other tests. I
am an INTJ (a 67 out of 70
in Keirsey & Bates test), idiosyncratic,
and a 5 (with a 4 wing) enneagram. I am also a drop out from academia and follow
a shamanic spiritual path.
+++Thanks Stephen. Sounds like you're right on course.
| From: | Glenn |
| cos90@telusplanet.net |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Mar 2001 |
Interesting stuff. I've read Oldham's work and came out strongly as a Solitary
type. My Enneagram type is a Five (5w6), which matches Oldham's result. However,
my MBTI profile (which I knew before ever hearing of either Oldham or Riso and
their tests) is ISTJ, which is at odds with the other two.
But I guess the correspondence isn't always perfect, is it? :)
I do not at all fit the INTP profile, which is the MBTI result that corresponds
with my ratings under Oldham and Riso. In fact, the person who tested me for the
MBTI told me that he would have guessed that I was an ISTJ without the test just
from talking with me. (And I'm a librarian by profession, which is a classic
ISTJ type of job).
OTOH, I'm definitely the Solitary type, and derive a certain amount of amusement
from the fact that much of the diagnostic criteria for the Schizoid Personality
Disorder could be applied to me if you stretched a few details. :-D
I'm also a Libra (born last week of September) but know virtually nothing about
Astrology, so I don't feel qualified to comment on that aspect of your
correlation.
Anyway, an interesting site. My undergrad major was in Psychology (whence my
earlier knowledge of all these tests), but this is the first place in which I've
found an attempt to compare and correlate the results of the various tests. I'm
going to explore the rest of your site now. Well done!
+++Thanks Glenn. I'm usually forgetful of the fact that the correspondence works perfectly only in my own mind. You're message is very convincing.
I am an INTP 9.
In general, I have used the
Enneagram and MBTI as complementary
systems. Each system fills in
some gaps that the other one
leaves behind, and neither can
entirely substitute for the
other, in my opinion.
The MBTI talks more
about functions, i.e. WHAT
you do, the Enneagram is more
about the motivations, i.e.
WHY you behave as you do.
Both are important.
+++Thanks Tom. I agree that the strength of the Enneagram is its focus on motivations. Oscar Ichazo was wise to adapt the old monastic system of "Cardinal Sins" to the Enneagram because of its usefulness in examining the human heart.
The DSM intentionally refrains from presenting any theory of motivations behind the mental disorders and even Oldham doesn't provide a systematic listing of motivations for his styles; that is, there's no stated theory behind the DSM/Oldham categories.
I'm hoping that evolutionary psychology will provide me with one.
Cory Caplinger took a shot at the principle motivations for each of Oldham's styles and I added some text from Keirsey (1978) in an attempt to come up with some motivations for all the types in my scheme.
Here is a typological representation of what I believe (acknowledging Florence Littauer) are the basic desires, or motivations, of the four temperaments:
| Temperament | Basic Desire | Cardinal Type | Noteworthy Example |
Idealist Rationalist Traditionalist Hedonist |
perfection power peace popularity |
Conscientious Aggressive Leisurely Self-confident |
Woodrow Wilson Franklin D. Roosevelt Ronald Reagan Bill Clinton |
| From: | Christina Lee |
| mostly_feathers@hotmail.com |
| Date: | Thur, 25 Feb 2001 |
You have associated the Type 9 enneagram personality to Myers-Briggs
STJ. But to me Type 9 is too agreeable and friendly to be a T. However, maybe
I'm wrong. It is possible that this agreability and friendliness of Type 9 is a
way of controlling the feeling function and is actually the result of an
INFERIOR feeling function. Do you think so?
+++Thanks Christina. I never became familiar with the MBTI® theory of functions.
I believe that too much is usually made of the 9's "peacefulness." My conception of the type comes from Don Riso's first book in which he describes the 9w8 as an ambivalent, hard to understand type, characteristically exhibiting both agreeableness and aggressiveness. Some other writers speak of the type's stubbornness and passive-aggressiveness. It seemed to me that the ESTJ *could* correspond to this pattern.
I note that in this study, http://tap3x.net/EMBTI/page0.html, the only correlation of Enneagram with MBTI® types that completely contradicts my correspondence is with the 9, where they find a correlation with INFP, ISFP. This supports your view.
| From: | |
| night_rain1@excite.com |
| Date: | Thur, 25 Feb 2001 |
Very_cool.
I'm_an_INTJ,_type_5(w/a_4_branch),
an_Aries,_and_idiosyncratic.
What_led_you_to_make_these
correspondances?
I've_always_thought_it_was_contradictory
that_I_was_an_Aries,_idiosyncratic,
and_an_INTJ,_since_Aries_are_supposed
to_be_extroverted.
(note:my_space_bar_is_broken)
+++Thanks. I'm a 5w6, so I knew the 5s pretty well. The idiosyncratic match with 5w4 seemed easy. It's turned out to be one of my most accepted and sure correspondences. I matched the Aries *type* to the MBTI® ENTJ. The correspondence of INTJ with the Aries *type* is not nearly so good. It comes mostly as a result of following Keirsey's way of coupling the E and I types like ENTJ and INTJ (see also Libra, Taurus, and Gemini).
It's an improbable coincidence (1 in 12) that you are actually an Aries and also an INTJ Idiosyncratic 5w4. I don't put any stock in Astrology; don't use it at all. It's included here mostly to show that the 12 signs, or whatever, are just types.
| From: | Brian Grimmer |
| brian@onexus.com |
| Date: | Thur, 22 Feb 2001 |
Uncanny
I am an ENTP, Enneagram 7 followed by a close 3 and a Libran. After reading the
descriptions of both the Inventive and Compensatory Narcissist I was totally
gobsmacked.
Good Work
+++Thanks very much, Brian.
| From: | Joyce Jace |
| jmjace@jmjace.com |
| www.jmjace.com |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Feb 2001 |
Mr. Kelly,
Not so much an opinion of the above, but rather a request. I'm writing an ebook
entitled, "Valid Characters For Your Novel: from the notes of a therapist". It
is to assist novel writers in character development of some very serious
personality disorders. This is an educational text only and I have expressly
warned readers to not use this as a diagnostic tool. I found your wonderful Web
site and would like permission to include the URLs to your site. Also let me
know if you would like to read this document prior to giving me this permission.
I have just started writing it and have about 12 pages which should give you a
clear picture of what I'm hoping to achieve.
Thank you,
Joyce Jace Roberson M Ed
www.jmjace.com
+++Hi Joyce. I'd be happy to have URLs of my pages included in your ebook.
| From: | Anna |
|
| Date: | Wed, 21 Feb 2001 |
Can you tell me which types are most likely to suffer from
uncontrollable anger and rage? Also, can anyone give me some addresses to
discussion forums on personality or psychological types? Thanks.
+++Hi Anna. I won't venture a guess just on the basis of this one trait. But you can probably gets some responses to your questions at this discussion board: http://www.9types.com/wwwboard/wwwboard.actual.html